Another technology that has mysterious origins is cryptocurrencies. To this day, no one really knows where Bitcoin originated, who created it, or who introduced it to the world. There is speculation all over the place, and it’s assumed someone knows, but that information is not public knowledge. Is Bitcoin a “gift” (more like a naked Trojan horse) from the interlopers? And is AI, and how it really works, similar in its origins? What can Creator tell us?

We are on record stating that cryptocurrency technology is an extraterrestrial invention that was introduced by the interlopers knowing it would seduce human financiers and people wanting to get ahead financially, always looking for the next new thing to come along to serve their personal interests, who could be seduced into capitalizing on the advent of a new means of monetary exchange, seemingly, and by getting on the bandwagon early enough, believe the hype that it will lead to wealth creation, and perhaps be the ultimate form of monetary value in exchange, given the continued failure of fiat currencies as civilizations come and go, empires rise and fall, and forms of money fall out of favor and lose their value. We see cryptocurrencies as a kind of Ponzi scheme. As long as people believe in them and pile in their savings, the price will rise and people will be rewarded, but at some point there will come a day of reckoning and people will lose confidence, and these mediums will plunge in value, and many people will have their lifesavings wiped out because, in the end, their only value is in what people are willing to pay, and so a digital record on a ledger somewhere only adds value in the mind of the beholder no matter its other attributes. Just like a dollar bill only has value to the extent someone is willing to give tangible goods in exchange for dollars, once dollar bills are diluted too greatly, in true value in terms of what they will buy, no one will take them and that currency will be replaced by something else. So this is a bait and switch scheme of the interlopers to attract the gullible to invest in a technological scheme that has the advantages of being shiny and new and seeming to solve a problem. But, like all technologies, it has a fatal flaw, a poison pill inherent in its workings that can, in the end, backfire and leave former adherents and true believers destitute. This is the intention for AI—to create a shiny new toy that seems to solve many human problems in a new way and, by creating a source of a lucrative commodity, will attract huge amounts of venture capital all competing to be first, to be best, to be the most desirable, and to make the most money. But just like with the cryptocurrency technology as a store of wealth, the use of AI as a substitute for human creativity and judgment is a simulation and not the genuine article. It is being introduced and promoted by the same extraterrestrial interlopers encouraging most of the technologies currently embraced by human society, all of which have downsides, hidden flaws, and even life-shortening liabilities. We have been able to share much knowledge about this with your channel who has probed over the years many deep questions and issues about human institutions, their workings, and the technologies, especially, they depend on and promote, in turn. We have stated for the record a number of times, in response to your channel's questions, that you were created to be self-sufficient in your native habitat without technology at all, and that is still true today except for the fact you have been misled and mistrained to embrace technology and rely on it more and more to the point where you are helpless without it and would have to relearn how to live if it were withdrawn or became infeasible. The advent of AI, as a tactic and technological framework to conduct human affairs, is a further corruption that can potentially undermine all human institutions in an even more serious and negative fashion. While everything humans do, care about, and want to see happen depends on information and the sharing of information, the bottom line is that human language is a very meager representation of conscious awareness and its capability to obtain deep understanding, intuitively, without language at all. The fact that AI is language-based poses a fundamental limitation that will not be surmounted but keep everything AI-based on a primitive plane. In the same way that language is a simulation of human understanding, to translate it into sound or a pictorial representation on a printed page, for example, or a computer screen text message, it is still a distillation, a simulation of human thought, feeling, intention and belief to varying degrees but all at once, in a human communication. It does so very crudely and imperfectly and only provides a surface representation that can be easily misunderstood and misapplied, misdirected, and used to misinform others. So anything generated by AI that is language-based will inherently be a surface representation of a deeper human awareness and experience subject to the same flaws, limitations, misunderstandings, and misinterpretations as humans communicating through language encounter routinely, and little appreciate how simplistic such exchanges truly are. This is the whole basis of championing social media; it is another invention of extraterrestrial technology to make people attempt to do more with what is actually less. This is why people talk past one another, jump to conclusions, misinterpret, misunderstand, misidentify, and misrepresent exchanges of text messages designed and constrained to be surface representations because they are forced to be minimalist exchanges of information. The very fact that the instruction data sets used to train AI systems are largely information coming from the Internet only reinforces that inherent flawed nature and limited scope of what is possible to generate through AI, starting from such a meager pool of knowledge and uncertain truth.