Our client writes: “I know you were going to do another Deep Subconscious HMR to help our son with his sleeping by himself at night, but we would like to shift the focus of the next session you do for him, based on a Processing Disorder Assessment that was done at his school recently. His weakest area is in the category of Attention. The specific issues that are of concern are: Visual Motor Speed, Processing Speed, Flexible Thinking, and Visual Memory. While we will be addressing these concerns with Occupational Therapy and other “outer” modalities, it occurred to me to ask you to address these at his deep subconscious level as well, since you’re scheduled to do a session on him anyway.” Can you comment on the appropriateness and approach we might use, to key in on the underlying life trauma feeding these problems? Can we simply request divine guidance for connecting to the most important events in the akashic records to address his issues as a group, or is it best to take them singly or take some other approach?

You can request divine direction be given to take them in the most important sequence if this must be divided into specific components, in terms of the healing needed, to help readjust his function more into the normal range. As you know, we are not enamored of using scientific criteria to direct healing work of a divine nature because science is so crude and lacks significant understanding of true causes of human problems, and the meager awareness of the psychological components and reasons for the discord they cause will greatly limit what can be done following scientific perspectives when it comes to healing, particularly involving the mind, because this has been a heavily corrupted arena—to misdirect everyone from a better understanding of human psychology and the workings of the mind itself, especially the role of consciousness and the interplay with emotions and past history. Nonetheless, you can work through Creator’s assistance knowing that whatever his mind brings up will in some way be relevant to improving his mental acuity and cognitive function, and that is the overall goal desired here. To what extent these particular measurement readouts are a problem in their own right, or secondary symptoms of deeper issues that have importance beyond how the child performs in a learning environment, and subsequent testing for which he must perform in comparison to other students, is only of importance in the context of the school setting, much less so in life overall. But we understand parents want the best for their children and are rightly concerned if someone sees a problem. It makes sense to address what is going on to the extent one can. We are only saying that, as you predicted, there would be little concordance between the scientific assessment of the child’s mental abilities and the history here as they are looking at cognitive function almost in the abstract and divorced from reality in a causal sense. This is why science is largely a series of dead-ends and little forward progress in a meaningful way.