Regardless of medical history and a healthy current status, what percent of people would benefit significantly from getting a chronic viral cleanout by taking a 3-week daily dose of both ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine, because some might be harboring viruses that will eventually cause a chronic illness?

We would say more than 50% of people, and the number would go up when you restrict this to adults. The difficulty here is that the greatest benefit would apply to those for whom a chronic infection is underway, but the many for whom that has not developed to a serious degree, if taking ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine for 3 weeks is done, in a sense, it is firing at a target that has not come into view yet. So, to be prophylactic for lifetime prevention, it would be necessary to keep following this regimen at regular intervals to stay ahead of infections that might get picked up during the course of the year, for example. So one could do this annually and have a fighting chance of staying ahead of the game and heading off major problems given the chronic viral consequences arise slowly, in many cases, and can fester at a low level of threat for years before becoming a serious impediment. The problem is prevention is the best strategy, rather than to wait until there is a fulminant chronic diagnosable disease underway, when it will be more difficult, challenging, complex, and uncertain whether taking these drugs will save the day. Getting rid of the viruses is only step one. The need to then heal all the damage that accrues from the illness taking a toll on the body, can mean some will not recover or regain all prior healthy function simply from having the virus removed. So this will be something that will have to be a learning journey for all involved. People have differing needs, differing wherewithal financially as well as with respect to the health status and age they are at in starting out to embrace this kind of strategy.