The authors of AI Snake Oil: What Artificial Intelligence Can Do, What It Can’t, and How to Tell the Difference, suggest that the track record of AI used for predicting social outcomes is so abysmally bad that it may actually amount to fraud. They write: “In short, some existing limits to predictability could be overcome with more and better data, while others seem intrinsic (built in and unfixable). In some cases, such as cultural products (like resume scanning AI, or AI used to decide who gets social benefits), we don’t expect predictability to get much better at all. In others, such as predicting individuals’ life outcomes, there could be some improvements but not drastic changes. Unfortunately, this hasn’t stopped companies from selling AI for making consequential decisions about people by predicting their future. So it is important to resist AI snake oil that’s already in wide use today rather than passively hope that predictive AI technology will get better.” What is Creator’s perspective?

Here again, we would say that the strange set of current affairs is an artificial intelligence creation already. You are being driven to focus on AI as an ultimate answer for the needs of human culture by nonhuman overseers. So this is quite ironic that the goals and gold standard for AI success is to simulate a simulated existence contrived by extraterrestrial manipulation of human culture, indirectly via mind control and genetic manipulation, to dim you down and dumb you down as human thinkers to begin with. Having been acculturated with mind control manipulation for thousands of years to warp and delude human perception and thinking, all of that is reflected in the human knowledge base as distortions and self-limited notions and sets of beliefs carved deeply in stone through outside manipulation to alter even the way you think, especially to constrain creativity and the usual source of human ingenuity, which is intuitive. That is a higher mode of intelligence because it can gather useful information from outside the person in a seemingly effortless and automatic fashion. That is consciousness at work in its essence as an extension of divine consciousness, an ultimate way of perceiving and understanding reality. What can be done based on computer chips, with input from the Internet being language-based and limited in content, cannot begin to even imagine being in the same league as human consciousness, let alone its divine origins. So this question gets to the point here, in a practical sense, where the rubber meets the road. When people depend on one another, if there is an attempt to substitute an artificial intelligence spokesperson or representative, who is being served? We predict that people will be the losers, not the originators and promoters of the AI systems. They are working as minions of the darkness, in effect, not realizing they are engaged in a kind of folly that will end up being more harmful than helpful, just like all the other technologies providing the infrastructure for human society in the Modern Era.