A viewers asks about the recent channeling discussing apparent anti-Semitism programming befalling popular conservative commentators Tucker Carlson and Candace Owens: “… There is a lot of evidence produced not only by these commentators but many others as well, as to the nefarious deeds and deceptions done by Zionists and the military industrial complex types. I have no doubt the ‘Jews’ are being made to be the obvious villains by most, if not all of the world, and this is indeed by design IMO. But maybe pointing out how the Jewish people themselves have been manipulated for centuries by the interlopers to perform deceptions and misdeeds to their neighbors to eventually help create this narrative of popular opinion turning against them, would go a long way to reveal the overall deception here, and that NO group is innocent or free from manipulation from our space-faring puppeteers. I have no desire to point any fingers at the Jewish people in any way, but I think it is important to see that they too are having their strings pulled. Maybe even more so than most. I can only imagine the enemies they made by not only spawning Moses, but also Jesus Christ himself. So they may very well be at the top of the ET’s hit list.” What is Creator’s perspective?

The Jewish people are, indeed, reviled by the extraterrestrials but it is because of their spirituality, their essential goodness, their desire to be a consistent supporter of the divine and to follow divine wisdom in how they live and what they do. To be sure, they are not perfect nor have they ever been, just as no other group of humans can be, as all are diminished by being in the physical plane as lesser creatures, literally, and not their light-being selves. So what this questioner is reacting to is seeing a selected topic given an airing, but wanting the whole loaf as though it would provide a better balance. While that is undoubtedly true, it cannot be done with every incremental fact-finding launching of a question as the output would be gigantic, and over time, hugely redundant in the bargain. So, not being a perfect process to begin with, there will be much room for misunderstandings and differing perspectives about what has been prioritized in the discussion and, as you know, that is very dependent on who the questioner might be and what they already know. In this case, as the channeler, you are the questioner and are steeped in having voluminous highly detailed knowledge of the Jewish history, good, bad, or indifferent, and there was no need to necessarily give the subjects of the discussion, those commentators, a pat on the back for acknowledging Jewish shortcomings when the point of the questions was how deeply anti-Semitic some of their commentary has been of late. And that is a different kind of question than whether the Jews are above reproach. We would not hesitate, and have not, to criticize any kind of overreaction or heavy-handed response militarily by anyone. But of course, that was not the question asked about these commentators. You are being asked to carry out a quite difficult mission, in a sense, to thread the eye of a needle. The problem being, there are many needles with eyes needing threading. And they are quite differing, with varied perspectives of the many individuals who come your way and have widely varying makeups and formed opinions, which is a kind of bias, inevitably, representing the need for selective perspectives on specific considerations, when such is never sufficient to be fully informative and take into account every nuance of every issue that might be involved. That is the limitation of the physical plane and the use of language as a quite poor means of communication. So the best thing you can do is to provide a reassuring commentary about the big picture, and where you stand to help reassure those who are too caught up in one side of the issue to know there are wider perspectives and that you are sticking with us and not a personal agenda in any way here.