485 views0 answers0 votes
577 views0 answers0 votes
427 views0 answers0 votes
515 views0 answers0 votes
521 views0 answers0 votes
492 views0 answers0 votes
458 views0 answers0 votes
578 views0 answers0 votes
A new report from Johns Hopkins University researchers reviewing hundreds of publications, concluded that lockdowns in the U.S. and Europe, including school closings, workplace closings, and shelter-in-place strategies, had little or no impact in reducing deaths from COVID-19. The lockdowns during the early phase of the pandemic in 2020 reduced COVID-19 mortality by only about 0.2%. They concluded, “We find no evidence that lockdowns, school closures, border closures, and limiting gatherings have had a noticeable effect on COVID-19 mortality.” On the other hand, there were global negative impacts: “While this meta-analysis concludes that lockdowns have had little to no public health effects, they have imposed enormous economic and social costs where they have been adopted. In consequence, lockdown policies are ill-founded and should be rejected as a pandemic policy instrument.” This seems to be a human vindication of Creator’s perspectives about the intent of the pandemic and its course. Can Creator comment?524 views0 answers0 votes
455 views0 answers0 votes
398 views0 answers0 votes
669 views0 answers0 votes
495 views0 answers0 votes
449 views0 answers0 votes
435 views0 answers0 votes