516 views0 answers0 votes
497 views0 answers0 votes
580 views0 answers0 votes
503 views0 answers0 votes
499 views0 answers0 votes
447 views0 answers0 votes
457 views0 answers0 votes
The HBO special “Life Afterlife” was another story, however. Dr. Schwartz wrote: “HBO had made a beautiful, inspiring show. But the science was sandwiched in the middle and lost nearly all its impact. We had expected that the show would leave the audience feeling ‘Science can be brought to bear on these issues,’ and ‘Wow, those mediums were tested by science and actually were found to be doing what they claimed.’ Instead, the show was good entertainment but little more. We had thought HBO really cared about the science, but discovered what the producers most wanted was to see how many people were crying when the lights went up. After all, HBO didn’t really care about making a scientific statement.” In fact, HBO had given almost as much air time to skeptics, as they did Dr. Schwartz’s experiments. The producers apparently believed they were being “professional and fair” giving equal time to skeptics and therefore creating a “balanced” presentation. But in this case, it seems a “balanced” presentation is simply sinister. What is Creator’s perspective?534 views0 answers0 votes
447 views0 answers0 votes
474 views0 answers0 votes
472 views0 answers0 votes
467 views0 answers0 votes
446 views0 answers0 votes
393 views0 answers0 votes
461 views0 answers0 votes