Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
The popular notion of the Law of Karma is the idea that: “Karma is wholly an anti perpetrator correction mechanism, that it was designed wholly to correct the problem of evil, and that the problem of evil rests wholly on the shoulders of perpetrators.” “People who live by the sword die by the sword,” as Christ put it. Certainly, there is more than a little truth in this, but from previous channelings, we have come to appreciate that this is not necessarily the whole story. Can Creator provide an updated, short working definition of the Law of Karma, and its purpose?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
659 views0 answers0 votes
We live in a time where the specialness of victimhood seems to be undergoing a celebration like never before—when being a victim somehow confers exalted status, a sign of purity, righteousness, and most importantly, innocence, as if it was actually something to aspire to. Can Creator comment on the notion of innocence, and if the term “innocent victim” has any genuine importance and status in the eyes of the divine?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
534 views0 answers0 votes
We learned in previous channelings that in recognition of the importance and difficulty of the mission life Jesus was to undergo, his karmic backlog was temporarily suspended and so, in a real sense, the story he was “born without sin” is a true one. So unless Jesus accumulated karma sufficient to warrant his crucifixion in the short thirty-some years of his life, he was, in a truly genuine sense, the ultimate innocent victim. We also know the cross is a symbol of the extraterrestrials, and what they consider a sign of their control and superiority, as in: “We did this to your guy, and you’re helplessly reminded of that every time you see it.” Given this backdrop, what is Creator’s message to innocent victims everywhere?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
587 views0 answers0 votes
Humanity is taught from the earliest age that Innocent victims owe nothing, and are in fact owed almost everything. We see this demonstrated in everything from a cop dedicating an entire career to solving just one murder, to victims becoming instant millionaires via online fundraising sites. “Innocent victims are owed JUSTICE!” is always the rallying cry that goes forth. Finding and punishing the perpetrator seems the most obvious duty owed to victims. Does this obsession with justice do more harm than good?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
544 views0 answers0 votes
Rarely is justice swift, and when it is, it is often unjust itself. This puts the victim in a kind of limbo waiting for closure that may be long in coming. This leaves the victim, as well as onlookers, feeling powerless. What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
594 views0 answers0 votes
This whole notion of closure seems less than ideal. It is regarded as of the utmost importance to achieve, and yet, in the end, how much does it actually change? The victim has no role to play but to sit and wait for something outside of themselves to happen. Can Creator comment on this notion of achieving closure, as something that must be done for the victim, rather than by the victim?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
562 views0 answers0 votes
Victimhood is widely equated with powerlessness. We expect victims to be powerless, fragile, distraught, and in need of protection and isolation. This seems counterintuitive if the goal is to empower victims to heal themselves to the greatest extent possible. The thinking seems to be, if we just leave victims alone, somehow their suffering will slowly evaporate and they’ll bounce back when they are ready. Once again, waiting for something to happen to them rather than making something happen themselves. What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
586 views0 answers0 votes
Victims are often thought of as “damaged goods.” This has been especially true in regard to the crime of rape, to such an extreme that some cultures have even blamed the victims themselves, and had them put to death along with the perpetrator, or even instead of the perpetrator. There is truth to the notion that emotional trauma can be crippling, and transform a once happy and gregarious person into someone almost unrecognizable. Some victims are so conscious of this fact, that they go out of their way to say, “It was no big deal.” What is Creator’s perspective on this dilemma?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
532 views0 answers0 votes
In all these questions we have been exploring the idea of the innocent victim who has no duty, and to whom everything is owed by agents and circumstances outside of themselves, that victims are special, but even so, may be regarded as undesirable damaged goods by some, or even many. In contrast, Creator said this in last week’s radio show: “As the guardian of your own soul, you are responsible even for healing what is done to you by others.” This seems to be quite a departure from the notion of the helpless victim, powerless to remedy their own situation. Can Creator comment further?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
537 views0 answers0 votes
Can Creator share how prayer work and the Lightworker Healing Protocol can empower victims to heal themselves and even their perpetrators, and rise above and away from the self-perception of being an innocent and helpless victim?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
707 views0 answers0 votes
We have been working on a client to help her transition at the request of family, who are overseeing her transfer to a dementia facility and witnessing the declining quality of life. Why was I unable to connect to my client’s mother to channel her deep subconscious to help her prepare for her transition?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
552 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner proposes asking a client’s higher self at the end of a session: “Higher Self, what Divine assistance does my client have currently? Who are their spirit guides, their angels? Who else is on their spirit team? Which past, future, or parallel selves are available to assist them who can be of most benefit to their soul’s plan? Thank you. Show me now.” Will this be productive and helpful?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
537 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner asks: “In the LHP, I want to add to the words ‘…help them find and embrace effective use of the Lightworker Healing Protocol and other GetWisdom teachings,’ the words, ‘or other equivalent and appropriate modalities.'” Any reason why not?
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
443 views0 answers0 votes
She also asks about teaching channeling: “Should I/ could I teach how to do channeling safely, through the ‘Divine Switchboard,’ in ARTICLES or videos? Why not just tell people what to do?”
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
576 views0 answers0 votes
A channeler asks: “If my, and other people’s, channelings are not corrupted, why not? I’m sure I’ve been ‘infected.'”
ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • 
619 views0 answers0 votes
« Previous1…342343344345346…694Next »
Ask Question