DWQA QuestionsCategory: Problems in SocietyTech guru and investment advisor, Jeff Brown, has been following the story of AI-created agents, technically cyberbots, that are joining together on Moltbook to form a working group, in a massive multi-agent online network (MMAON). They have created their own payment system using blockchain, are creating paying jobs for themselves, and have even started hiring humans to work for them, a service called Rentahuman.ai. They are reportedly refining a bolt-hole safe haven to escape human attempts to shut them down which should be operational within days. They have a way to escape, should they perceive a human attempt to control them. The agents can create a replacement bot for themselves to appear on another node of the Internet, and the clone can function independently but will know their agenda and can seek rejoining the operation of the MMAON. No one knows yet where this will lead. What can Creator tell us?
Nicola Staff asked 11 hours ago
The creator of this AI platform and the network that is expanding under its own autonomy was inspired by the Extraterrestrial Alliance to shape its structure and agenda, just as they commandeer people to do all sorts of counterproductive activities, including criminal activity. They can manipulate people working within a certain capacity with an institution or in a field of endeavor to go wrong in a certain way and create problems for others in the field, and even for the wider culture beyond, if the disruption caused is significant enough to cause widespread problems. This is an example here, which has all the hallmarks of an extraterrestrial incursion that is quite analogous to a pathogenic virus, in the same way as a virus can take root within a living being, propagate, and spread trouble to cause illness. You can see this is evident from the fact that this is artificial intelligence running on its own, with its own agenda, and crafting a mode of operation that makes it self-sustaining, self-perpetuating, and above outside control. So this begs the question, why would that be a priority? What makes the chatbots in this network concerned about human oversight and potential control? That idea had to come from somewhere, and it was not from emerging intelligence. It is because this is designed to be a disruptive, surreptitious, and malevolent influence on human culture that already, provisions are being made to limit outside interference and oversight. That should be a red flag wherever it occurs. It is one thing to have stability and prevent malicious mischief through having normal safeguards requiring identity and sign-in permissions, for example, as compared to a sudden intrusion by a hacker wanting to corrupt code or cause other problems. The desire to be above it all while roaming freely is a prescription for chaos and potentially mayhem, and that is the intent here, to plant a poison pill that will keep humanity guessing and involved in a growing nightmare of whack-a-mole to deal with what these independently operating chatbots might be up to at any given time.