A new report from Johns Hopkins University researchers reviewing hundreds of publications, concluded that lockdowns in the U.S. and Europe, including school closings, workplace closings, and shelter-in-place strategies, had little or no impact in reducing deaths from COVID-19. The lockdowns during the early phase of the pandemic in 2020 reduced COVID-19 mortality by only about 0.2%. They concluded, “We find no evidence that lockdowns, school closures, border closures, and limiting gatherings have had a noticeable effect on COVID-19 mortality.” On the other hand, there were global negative impacts: “While this meta-analysis concludes that lockdowns have had little to no public health effects, they have imposed enormous economic and social costs where they have been adopted. In consequence, lockdown policies are ill-founded and should be rejected as a pandemic policy instrument.” This seems to be a human vindication of Creator’s perspectives about the intent of the pandemic and its course. Can Creator comment?290 views0 answers0 votes
257 views0 answers0 votes
251 views0 answers0 votes
356 views0 answers0 votes
292 views0 answers0 votes
268 views0 answers0 votes
269 views0 answers0 votes
631 views0 answers0 votes
335 views0 answers0 votes
327 views0 answers0 votes
464 views0 answers0 votes
366 views0 answers0 votes
269 views0 answers0 votes
309 views0 answers0 votes
The late Dr. Ian Stevenson was a Medical Doctor and Psychiatrist who spent much of his adult life and career studying cases of childhood memories and birthmarks suggestive of reincarnation, mostly in India, where such memories are not as quickly dismissed as they are in the Western world. A commentator said, “Dr. Stevenson was not upset that critics dismissed his work, but that they did so without ever reading it.” A skeptic wrote of Dr. Stevenson, that his work “is full of errors, flaws, gaps, messes, and difficulties. It does not correspond to the sort of work required in courses on research methods given to third and fourth-year college students.” And with that broad stroke, the skeptic dismisses a man’s life’s work, amounting to the study of some 2400 cases! What is Creator’s perspective of Dr. Stevenson’s efforts, and is the late Dr. Ian Stevenson safely in the light?365 views0 answers0 votes