A practitioner asks: “If the divine offering of love is rejected, show a sequel which includes a glimpse of the future trajectory of their chosen path, and, if need be, in grand finale fashion; expose the revelation that ‘humans were created to rescue the perpetrators from their own extinction.’” Is this appropriate and effective?

Again, this presupposes that there will be a grand awakening as in conveying a set of facts and information that simply needs to be plugged in and then everyone will get the message, will get the point, and will know what to do. Again, we cannot lead, so we cannot rush in and impose our will on each individual human by telling them what they need to do and threatening them by showing them what will happen if they don’t. What is needed is a far more subtle approach that must be exquisitely timed and implemented to respect the boundaries and work on the problem incrementally across the many timelines involved for each individual.