DWQA QuestionsCategory: Coronavirus COVID-19The Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines did not impact overall mortality, a reanalysis of clinical trial data found. The two vaccines, both based on messenger RNA (mRNA) technology, protected against deaths from COVID-19 but that effect was offset by vaccinated trial participants being more likely to die from cardiovascular problems, Christine Stabell Benn, a health professor at the University of Southern Denmark, and other researchers reported in April in the journal, Cell. On the other hand, vaccines that utilized adenoviruses, such as the Johnson & Johnson vaccine, had a favorable impact on both COVID-19 mortality and overall mortality, according to the reanalysis. The research analyzed data from randomized clinical trials (RCTs) reported by the companies that manufacture the vaccines. “In the RCTs with the longest possible blinded follow-up, mRNA vaccines had no effect on overall mortality despite protecting against some COVID-19 deaths. On the other hand, the adenovirus-vector vaccines were associated with lower overall mortality,” researchers said. Is this re-analysis accurate and trustworthy? What is the conclusion we should draw from this work?
Nicola Staff asked 11 months ago
Unfortunately, the clinical studies of the mRNA vaccines have been tampered with, both to cause some inaccuracy, some misunderstanding, and misinterpretation of data classification and recording, leading to errors, but primarily because the end results were manipulated to make the vaccines look bad. Mortality was increased in the vaccine arms with regard to the Pfizer and the Moderna studies. This was easy for the Extraterrestrial Alliance to do and serves their interests because they were shocked at the greater than expected survival of Covid-19 patients to begin with, and any attempt of humans to fight back with vaccines rubs salt in the wound, so to speak. The interlopers will often act out of vengeance seeking to punish those who do something that gets in their way or causes their plans to fall through, and this includes all kinds of direct interventions with human affairs, whether arranging the wrong outcomes in criminal trials as well as the medical arena to interfere with clinical studies in the outcomes data and its interpretation. This can include not only preventing something from showing effectiveness, but actually make it seem worse than doing nothing at all. Given that the majority of patients were not at high risk, the data are much less meaningful with respect to their showing a value in this population, because so few developed disease symptoms to begin with. That makes it easy to do enough manipulation to create a significant shift in one direction or another. So these studies can simply be discounted as having any value.